On this site you will find independent comparatives of Anti-Virus software. Tests are done on behalf of producers and magazines. Our work is free of fee, but you can donate us something if you appreciate our efforts to make independent comparatives.
In order to get tested by us, products must fulfill some criteria. The 3 main criteria are:
* The product must use only one (own) scan-engine * The product must have a 100% ItW-virus detection * The product must detect a given minimum of Zoo-samples
So, all products that are listed in our comparatives are already a selection of very good anti-virus software. Various products were tested in advance in order to discover if they does fulfill our criteria.
Comparative results will be available for all officially at those dates: 1st March and 1st September: comparative results of on-demand detection of virus/malware 1stJune and 1st December: retrospective/proactive test results
The following products were used in the last comparative (with best possible settings): Look into the online results to determine the exact version number.
Avast! Professional Edition 4.1 BitDefender Professional Edition 7.2 Dr.Web for Windows 95-XP 4.30a NOD32 2.0 F-Prot for Windows 3.14b RAV Reliable Anti-Virus 8.6 H+B EDV AntiVir Professional 6.22 Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 4.5 McAfee VirusScan 8.0 Panda Platinum Internet Security 8.0 Sophos Anti-Virus 3.78 Symantec Norton Anti-Virus 2004 Trend Micro Internet Security 2004 __________ MfG Ralf SEO-Spam Hunter
Um auf dieses Thema zu ANTWORTEN bitte erst » hier kostenlos registrieren!!
http://www.av-comparatives.org/
On this site you will find independent comparatives of Anti-Virus software. Tests are done on behalf of producers and magazines. Our work is free of fee, but you can donate us something if you appreciate our efforts to make independent comparatives.
In order to get tested by us, products must fulfill some criteria. The 3 main criteria are:
* The product must use only one (own) scan-engine
* The product must have a 100% ItW-virus detection
* The product must detect a given minimum of Zoo-samples
So, all products that are listed in our comparatives are already a selection of very good anti-virus software. Various products were tested in advance in order to discover if they does fulfill our criteria.
Comparative results will be available for all officially at those dates:
1st March and 1st September: comparative results of on-demand detection of virus/malware
1stJune and 1st December: retrospective/proactive test results
The following products were used in the last comparative (with best possible settings):
Look into the online results to determine the exact version number.
Avast! Professional Edition 4.1
BitDefender Professional Edition 7.2
Dr.Web for Windows 95-XP 4.30a
NOD32 2.0
F-Prot for Windows 3.14b
RAV Reliable Anti-Virus 8.6
H+B EDV AntiVir Professional 6.22
Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 4.5
McAfee VirusScan 8.0
Panda Platinum Internet Security 8.0
Sophos Anti-Virus 3.78
Symantec Norton Anti-Virus 2004
Trend Micro Internet Security 2004
__________
MfG Ralf
SEO-Spam Hunter